![]() ![]() ![]() With so much to gain from it, this book is must-read, specially if one is interested in philosophy. ![]() The downside of this is that there are some portions of this book (specially Book IV) that are heavily outdated nonetheless, with a sober hermeneutical attitude, one can somehow overcome these deficiencies to grasp a higher order of meaning underlying the whole of it (including the heavily time/place-specific context). Rousseau shows himself as a very passionate writer, one who's not afraid in taking stances about a wide range of issues. As Emile grows, the goal starts to become more and more clear, as grows the scope of criticisms and reform proposals. ![]() So the child must be raised free, equal to all others around him/her, and connected to all through bonds of natural fraternity. Throughout the text, readers are instilled to think on their own, to come to terms with a new way of thinking Man from its most profound roots, and how a child must be raised in conformity to nature (his/her nature, as Rousseau conceives it). It's through this experience that we start to grasp the scope of his criticisms, and the way he wants to prepare people for the coming of a new order. And what best place to start with than by educating people to be good citizens? So the philosopher conceives of a thought experiment where he plays the role of a tutor for more than 20 years of a young scholar named Emile. Rousseau wants to reform the state of the decadent human institutions of his time. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |